Why this thread was made(Finished talking about making a thread with JIM-san) http://set.bbspink.com/test/read.cgi/erobbs/1202891905/335- This thread is a place to discuss about troubles and inconvenieces that is predicted by the affect from 全板人気トーナメント, and to discuss how we can prevent and deal with it. More >>7
First, about No3. About under age problem, it is written in GL8 so we can just delete as usual. But because of "全板人気トーナメント", we can predict that there will be many uploads, which we should delete. So why dont we make more "削除人" and prepare for whats predicted? Next, about No.1. There are posts called"挨拶周り"(greeting posts), which is similar to multi-post. But since these posts are what people have been doing this for the past 2 times, I do not think we should restrain it. It is hard to see the difference between multi-post and greeting posts, but we'll get used to it. About No.2, I think that we can stop the threads that was made by non-PINK users. Ofcourse not all, but threads that we can define that was made for people outside of BBSPINK.
Since JIM-san mentioned "Good or bad our record, and even the reckless record of our conduct should be preserved as much as possible by the constraints of our local rules and the rule of law.", we should discuss mainly about access(writing) regulations (書込規制) against the posts.
>>12 sorry, i mean Nevada >>8 テキサス州法ではなくネバダ州法の間違いです。
14 ：
wwwwwwwwww There is a big difference between Texas and Nevada.
15 ：
sry, i forgot it was Nevada lol How do you think about it?
16 ：
Limiting by .htaccess is possible, but are you talking about making PINKちゃんねるへ password only? That will never happen.
17 ：
> password only? That will never happen. I understand that. The htaccess limits that we are talking about is by limiting it by IP address. we're not thinking about the password authorization.
18 ：
>>17 and who decides which ips can access? This is a sore subject for me.
19 ：
we define only the ips that CAN NOT access. Other IPs will be able to access. .htaccess order allow,deny allow from all deny from .hoge.ne.jp deny from 10.10.0.0/16 Maybe we need some new volunteers who can decide which ip to deny. >This is a sore subject for me. i understand, but I really think we need to be prepared for atleast No.3. If the deletion doesnt catch up, the only way we can prevent is by access limiting.
20 ：
I already have that system made. I have implimented it several times without people even noticing it. However it does overwrite the current blocking systems that 2ch uses.
Yes, >>9 suggested some idea that is already working fine, like your htacess system :) I dont know how it overwrites the system, but if its PINKBBS htaccess > 2ch blocking system I dont think there are any problems (if both systems are working).
I think we need to start moving as fast as possible. I know there are some points that we can fix in >>7, so if there is something plz write. This is what I think we need. 1. People who will inform us about posts that are suspicious. ( <- Where? Maybe we may make a new thread in PINK規制議論) 2. Someone will check the posts, and actually do the blocking (<- maybe JIM-san?) 3. Someone to listen to the user and may accept deregulation.
